> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.securd.org/documentation/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.securd.org/documentation/securd-models/lp-token-rating-model/examples.md).

# Examples

In order to illustrate the rating methodology, we consider three liquidity pools from Uniswap V2: • USDC-WETH; • DAI-USDC; • WBTC-WETH. The following results are obtain from the USDC-WETH pool:

| VeV (%) | MRM | VeS (%) | LRM |
| :-----: | :-: | :-----: | :-: |
|   66.2  |  6  |   0.04  |  1  |

*Table 4: USDC-WETH liquidity pool.* 

The MRM of the USDC-WETH pool is 6 (Highly speculative) as it is well known that crypto-assets are highly volatile which is reflected in the VeV. However, since it is one of the largest pool in terms of liquidity of Uniswap V2, the LRM is 1 as expected. 

| VeV (%) | MRM | VeS (%) | LRM |
| :-----: | :-: | :-----: | :-: |
|   1.8   |  1  |   0.09  |  1  |

*Table 5: DAI-USDC liquidity pool.* 

On the other hand, the MRM of the DAI-USDC pool is 1 (Prime quality) because stable-coins are less volatile than crypto-assets.

| VeV (%) | MRM | VeS (%) | LRM |
| :-----: | :-: | :-----: | :-: |
|  32.29  |  5  |   0.21  |  2  |

*Table 6: WBTC-WETH liquidity pool.*

Finally, the MRM of the WBTC-WETH pool is 5 (Speculative). The resulted MRM is better than the USDC-WETH pool thanks to the positive correlation between the WBTC and the WETH which reduces volatility and therefore risk.